AS
Anand Sinha Vice President, Strategy — A4H  ·  June 2026

The Bubble We Built Cannot Be Passed Down

We came to America and did everything right. We worked harder than anyone around us. We put our children in STEM programs, math enrichment classes, spelling bees, soccer leagues, tennis academies. We drove them to Hindi class on Sunday mornings and sat through every science fair and piano recital. We built careers, bought homes, funded college funds. We were the model immigrants — quiet, productive, and deeply invested in the next generation.

And while we were doing all of that, other people were in a different kind of room.

While we were focused on our children's futures, bills were being introduced — and in some cases signed into law — that directly target how Hindu Americans are perceived, treated, and judged in American institutions:

  • Caste discrimination bills that treat being Hindu or Indian as sufficient grounds for an HR complaint — with no burden of proof and no offsetting benefit. CA SB403 ↗   NY A6920 ↗
  • Swastika criminalization laws that equate our sacred symbol, used in rangoli and temple ceremonies for five thousand years, with the Nazi hakenkreuz — so that a Hindu family decorating their doorstep at Diwali can be reported to authorities. VA HB2783 (enacted) ↗
  • Campus conduct frameworks at major universities that classify Hindu religious practice as a system of social oppression, embedded into mandatory diversity training your children sit through.
  • Foreign agent designation bills that treat Hindu Americans' connections to India as evidence of foreign influence — the same logic used against other diaspora communities this country has historically persecuted.
  • Federal employment law proposals that would add caste to Title VII, making every Hindu professional in America a potential defendant in a federal discrimination claim.
  • K–12 textbook bias — a submitted Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 6th grade textbook described the Vedas as "spells and charms" and "secret rituals," depicted India through images of slums and poverty, and erased the Upanishads entirely — while Greek and Hebrew texts were treated as history and their civilizations celebrated. The California State Board rejected it in 2017 after Hindu American protests. The battle over what stays in the approved curriculum is ongoing. Hinduism Today — Board Proceedings ↗   CDE Instructional Materials ↗

Your child sits in a 6th grade classroom and watches their teacher read aloud that their ancestors practiced "spells and charms." Their classmates turn and look. Some snicker. Your child has no language to defend what they know to be sacred — because the textbook is the authority in that room, and the textbook has already decided.

This is not an abstract policy concern. It happens in classrooms across California, Texas, New Jersey, and Michigan — in the schools where our children spend six hours a day forming their sense of who they are. When a child sees their religion described as primitive, their homeland depicted as a place of poverty and filth, and their sacred symbols treated as embarrassments, they do not argue back. They go quiet. They stop bringing their tiffin to school. They stop correcting the pronunciation of their name. They start telling people they are "not really religious." They trade their identity for social survival — one small concession at a time — until the person who emerges at eighteen has learned to be ashamed of everything their grandparents held sacred.

We built the bubble to protect them. The curriculum got inside it anyway.

The legislators writing these bills had willing ears — people feeding them data, framing the narrative, and showing up at every hearing. We were not at that table. The authors knew exactly who would file the complaints once these bills passed. They were counting on it. And they were counting on us not being in the room when the votes were taken.

To get to that table we need relationships with legislators — their access, their ears, and their willingness to hear our side before the vote, not after.

They were right that we weren't there. That is what A4H exists to change.

"In 2023–24, Hindu Americans collectively invested less than two cents per person in political infrastructure. That is not modesty. That is absence."

This is not alarmism. Every item above is documented — named institutions, named bills, public legislative records. The pages in this edition lay it out case by case, institution by institution, number by number.

What follows is the documented record — named bills, named institutions, verified numbers. We built everything else for this community: careers, homes, futures for our children. The one thing we have not built is a seat at the table where decisions about that future are made. That is what A4H exists to change.

A4H — Americans4Hindus — is the organization working to close this gap. It is the only Hindu Super PAC in America. It operates on a volunteer basis. Every dollar goes toward funding candidates who understand what is at stake for our community.

What follows is the case for why it matters, and what you can do about it. I wrote this because I believe the data is more persuasive than any appeal to identity — and because the people in my community who need to act are the ones who respond to evidence, not emotion.


Navigate to the Section That Concerns You Most

Tab 2 — The Issues
What Is Already Happening to Our Community

The Caste Trap. Faith framed as oppression. Sacred symbols criminalized. Temple attacks that go unanswered. These are not theoretical — they are documented policies in place right now.

Tab 3 — The Evidence
Named Institutions. Documented Actions.

Cisco. Seattle. Brandeis. Brown. California SB403. Harvard. University of Michigan. Not speculation — a record of what has already been decided, and what is still being decided right now.

We Are Bringing a Toothpick to a Gunfight

Jewish Americans: $17 per person. Muslim Americans: $0.13 per person. Hindu Americans: $0.02 per person. The gap is 850×. The chart makes it impossible to ignore.

Tab 5 — Join A4H
What You Can Do — Starting Today

57,000 members across 38 states. 100% of funds to candidate support — no salaries, no overhead. $100/year or $10/month puts you at the table. This is the page to act.


$0.02
Per-person political investment by Hindu Americans
850×
Gap vs. Jewish American per-person PAC spending
700+
Equality Labs lobbying meetings in one CA cycle

Sources: FEC filings 2023–24 (OpenSecrets); Equality Labs lobbying disclosure, California Legislature 2023 session; Pew Research Center 2024 Hindu American population estimate.

The policies are already written. The institutions have already acted. Tab 2 shows you what's on the books right now.

What Is Already Happening to Our Community

These are not distant threats. They are policies already on the books, bills that nearly became law, and practices embedded in workplaces right now.

This is not like India's reservation system. In India, caste classification comes with government benefits — reserved seats in jobs and education. In America, there are no such benefits. None. Caste is being added purely as a discrimination category — meaning any Hindu or Indian employee can be accused of caste bias by a colleague, triggering an HR investigation, with no offsetting advantage whatsoever. Vague definitions make it easier to file complaints, not harder. You do not need to know someone's actual caste to accuse them.

California's SB403 was authored by Aisha Wahab — an Afghan-American Muslim state senator — and co-authored by Ash Kalra, an Indian-American Hindu assemblyman. The organization behind it, Equality Labs, ran over 700 lobbying meetings in a single legislative cycle. Governor Newsom vetoed it in 2023. They have publicly stated they will bring it back.

Meanwhile, Cisco, Brandeis, Brown, and multiple UC campuses have already embedded caste policies into HR and student conduct frameworks — no legislation needed.

At Michigan, Harvard, and Columbia, mandatory diversity training frames Hindu practice as a social hierarchy to be dismantled. Your child is navigating a campus where their identity is a liability. State legislatures control what is taught in K–12 classrooms. PAC funding of the right candidates is how that changes.

A Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 6th grade textbook submitted for California state adoption described the Vedas as "spells and charms" and "secret rituals," ignored the Upanishads entirely, and misquoted the Bhagavad Gita. The same books depicted ancient India through images of slums, poverty, and cows eating trash — while Greek philosophers and Hebrew heroes were celebrated. The word "Hinduism" itself was separately proposed to be replaced with "ancient Indian religion" in state curriculum guidelines. The California State Board rejected the HMH textbook in 2017 after sustained Hindu American advocacy — but the underlying curriculum framework that shapes what all publishers submit remains contested.

Meanwhile the Bhagavad Gita was described as a character in "an adventure story — like action movies of today." The Mahabharata was introduced as thrilling fiction. Biblical accounts were treated as history. Hindu scripture was treated as mythology.

This is not ancient history. The Hindu American Foundation confirmed in 2021 that colonial-era misconceptions have still not been fully removed from educational materials. The battle over what your child's teacher reads aloud in class is ongoing — and for most of the past two decades, we were not in the room where the curriculum was approved.

The consequence is not abstract. When a child hears their religion described as primitive in front of their classmates, they do not argue back. They go quiet. They stop bringing their tiffin to school. They shorten their name. They say "I'm not really religious." They trade their identity for social survival — one small concession at a time — until the teenager who emerges has learned to be ashamed of everything their grandparents held sacred. We sent them to school to get ahead. The curriculum taught them to disappear.

→ Hinduism Today — CA Board Proceedings 2017   → CDE Instructional Materials (official)

Our sacred swastika — used in rangoli, temples, and weddings for 5,000 years — is being equated to the Nazi Hakenkreuz in state legislation. These are two different symbols with different names, origins, and meanings. Without our voice in the drafting room, these bills will never make that distinction.

Virginia HB-2783 (2025) is the counter-example: it explicitly protected the Hindu swastika while classifying the Nazi hakenkreuz as a Class 6 felony. That passed because Hindu Americans organized and showed up. It is proof the model works.

Political attention follows political organization. When other communities face attacks on their places of worship, organized lobbying infrastructure ensures swift legislative response. We have no equivalent. Every attack trends on WhatsApp for 48 hours and then disappears with zero political consequence for anyone.

In California, anti-Hindu hate ranked second only to antisemitism for four consecutive years — including six temples vandalized in a single two-week span, with no arrests.

The next crisis will not announce itself. Without pre-built legislative relationships and rapid-response capacity, we will react the same way we always have — too late and too scattered to make any politician pay a price. A4H is building that infrastructure now, before the next crisis hits.

These aren't abstractions. Tab 3 names the specific institutions — universities, corporations, and legislatures — that have already acted against us.

Named Institutions. Documented Actions.

If you think these are distant or theoretical — they are not. The following institutions have already acted. These are documented policies and legislative records, not projections.

Already Law or Policy

A federal lawsuit revealed Cisco discriminated against a Dalit engineer — and internal HR policy treated caste as a protected category, effectively placing Hindu and Indian employees under a presumption of guilt. This policy is already in place and has set a national template now replicated across Silicon Valley.

→ Original DFEH Filing (California CRD)

Seattle became the first U.S. city to add caste as a protected category in anti-discrimination law in 2023. The ordinance passed with no meaningful Hindu voice in the room — because we had no political relationships with the council. More cities are watching.

Brandeis has added caste as a protected category in its official non-discrimination and harassment policies. The standard used is based on activist frameworks that treat Hindu identity as inherently connected to caste oppression.

Brown has implemented caste protections. The standard used is based on activist frameworks that treat Hindu identity as inherently connected to caste oppression. Hindu students had no representation when these policies were adopted.

Legislative Success — Proof of Concept

Virginia HB-2783 passed in 2025, explicitly distinguishing the Hindu swastika from the Nazi hakenkreuz in state law. This bill passed because Hindu Americans organized, showed up, and had relationships with legislators in advance. It is direct proof that the model works — and that the same model is needed everywhere else.

→ Read the enacted law (Virginia Legislature)

Vetoed — Campaign Continues

SB403 would have added caste discrimination to California state law. Vetoed by Governor Newsom in 2023 after sustained advocacy — and its architects have stated publicly they will reintroduce it. → Read the bill (CA Legislature)

The organization behind SB403 is Equality Labs — funded through the Ford Foundation, the Omidyar Network, and Open Society-linked grant channels. Their full-time staff conducted over 700 advocacy meetings across California in a single legislative cycle. The lobbying infrastructure they built remains fully intact and active.

New York A6920/S6531 would add caste to state employment and housing anti-discrimination law. As of the close of the 2025–26 session, it carried 22 Assembly and 11 Senate co-sponsors and an endorsement from the UN Special Rapporteur on minority issues. CoHNA and HAF filed formal opposition. It returns in January 2027.

→ Assembly Bill A6920 (NY Legislature)  ·  → Senate Bill S6531 (NY Legislature)

Advocacy groups have pushed U of M to adopt caste discrimination policies. Michigan is where A4H's chapter is most active — and this is exactly why local organization matters. We need to be at the table before this vote happens, not after.

Faculty and student groups have pushed to add caste to Harvard's non-discrimination policy. The campaign is ongoing — and the framework being used is identical to what passed in Seattle.

Separately, a 2026 Columbia Law Review article proposes adding caste to federal employment law under Title VII. If adopted as an academic precedent, it sets the stage for federal litigation and eventual rulemaking — making caste discrimination a nationwide federal employment law issue affecting every Hindu American professional in the country.

Now see the numbers that explain how this keeps happening — and why organizing changes the math.

We Are Bringing a Toothpick to a Gunfight

Every diaspora community that has achieved durable political influence in America did the same thing: it organized, it funded, and it showed up — year after year, election after election. The pattern is not a secret. The question is whether our community is willing to follow it.

The Organization Gap: A Wake-Up Call
2023–24 Political Spending — PAC contributions and full ecosystem where applicable
Jewish American
AIPAC / United Democracy Project
~$127M
Muslim American — Emgage
Total Ecosystem
PAC + Foundation + operations
Tap to see breakdown ▼
~$4.1M
Hindu American — A4H
Americans4Hindus
Super PAC — all volunteer
$0.02 per person · 850× gap vs. Jewish community
<$100K

The Michigan Proof Point

In 2024, 101,000 Michigan voters cast "Uncommitted" ballots in the Democratic primary — a coordinated protest vote organized by a single community. Michigan was decided by roughly 80,000 votes in the general election. That community, without a large PAC, demonstrated that organized bloc power moves electoral outcomes.

The pattern works. It works for every community that commits to it. The only question is whether we are willing to do what they did.

The gap is real. Closing it starts with one decision. Tab 5 shows you exactly what joining A4H costs and where every dollar goes.

A4H — The Table We Are Building

Every other community that achieved durable political influence followed the same path: organize, fund, show up. Year after year. Cycle after cycle. A4H is that organization for Hindu Americans. It is the only one.

  • 100% volunteer operation — no salaries, no overhead, all funds to candidate support
  • 57,000+ members across 38 states
  • 26 members in the Congressional Hindu-Buddhist-Sikh-Jain Caucus
  • Quarterly FEC filings — publicly audited, fully transparent
  • Active in Virginia (HB-2783 victory), California (SB403 defeat), New York (A6920 opposition)

Where Does the Money Go

A4H runs entirely on a volunteer basis — no salaries, no overhead. All contributions go directly toward funding candidates who champion community issues and civic representation.

100%
of funds toward candidate support — no salaries
Quarterly
FEC filings, publicly audited and accessible
57,000+
members across 38 states
26
members in the Congressional Hindu-Buddhist-Sikh-Jain Caucus

Join A4H

Membership is free and takes 30 seconds. Contributions are what power the work — all of them go directly toward funding candidates who champion community issues and civic representation.

$100
Supporting Membership (annual)
— or —
$10/month
$10,000
A4H Trustee
Voice in strategy & funding decisions

To become a Member, select $100 at checkout and note "Annual Membership" in the comments.
Trustees may contribute further as the PAC's needs require.